Recent PostsCTN Issue: December 2016 Thomas Hazlett & Michael Honig, The Price of Freedom: How to Charge for Spectrum as WiFi and Cellular Collide IEEE ComSoc Technology News (Dec. 2016) Al[...]Thomas Hazlett recently reviewed two new volumes on the Information Economy for the International Journal of Economics of Business. Both Martin Campbell-Kelly and Daniel D. Garcia-Swartz, [...]My new research shows that more Internet access funding doesn't help students. And almost all U.S. schools are already online. By Thomas Hazlett 08/23/16 09:27 AM EDT Even during[...]How an early telephone silencer took on AT&T. By Lauren Young via Atlas Obscura It's not unusual today to overhear strangers' intimate phone conversations while comm[...]
Technological Change and Merger Policy’s Third Era
Presentation to Merger Analysis in High Technology Markets Conference 2008. Howard Shelanski, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center.
Changes in Merger Policy Over the Last Century. Evolutionary Changes: Antimonopoly Era (1904-1973), Consumer Welfare Era (1973-2004), Dynamic Efficiency Era (2004-). Cyclical Changes: Merger review has varied in the scope of its objectives: from narrow anti-bigness => broader balance of efficiency and small-business protection => narrow consumer welfare focus => broader balance of static efficiency and innovation. The Antimonopoly Era: Northern Securities Co. v. US (1904). Case initiated the anti-monopoly era of merger review. Established that mergers were within the purview of Section I of the Sherman Act. Coupled with precedent for strict, textual construction of Section 1 (Trans-Mo., 1899), Northern Securitiesswept mergers under the strong statutory prohibition against “everycontract combination . . . or conspiracy in restraint of trade.”
GDE Error: Error retrieving file - if necessary turn off error checking (404:Not Found)